Some unusual Christmas reflections…
Susu presented an interesting clarification upon the song “The Twelve Days of Christmas”. Apparently, “five golden rings” doesn’t refer to rings on your sweetie’s finger, but ring-necked pheasants. Hence, the first seven gifts are birds and then the last five are people. So, ‘true love’ is gifting birds and then, all of the sudden, people become bird-gift surrogates? What’s up with that? My question is: who traffics in the giving of people as gifts? Slave-owners and slave-traders, of course. So maybe eight maids a’milking are actually wet nurses attending plantation babies whose momma is cavorting with indentured lords a’leaping (while her husband slips dollar bills into the thongs of the enslaved ladies dancing)???
Melchior, King of Arabia, gifted Jesus a chest of gold. Yep. He didn’t reach into his pockets and rummage for a few spare gold coins. All the depictions I see, show a fairly hefty chest itself made out of gold and, I’d imagine, it was filled with gold, too. Otherwise, you’d end up with the ‘big-empty-box-little-gift spoof’—totally inappropriate for a child king. Last I checked, a chest of gold is a king’s fortune and, in fact, it is traditionally explained that this signifies that Jesus was, indeed, a king. Significance aside, Jesus was rich from that moment on. My question is: What did Mary and Joseph as caretakers do with the fortune? Yes, a manger scene is touching cinematographically . But if I were destitute and had a newborn relegated to a manger then suddenly came upon a fortune, I’d buy into some better lodging (even if I had to bribe a lodge manager to evict someone else) before another flea could bite my baby’s ass.
For an extreme view of where capitalists would take us with the ‘traditon’ of holiday shopping, take a look at Commodifying Jesus or WWJDWS—What Would Jesus Do (While Shopping)?

Recent Comments