Day: February 22, 2002










  • Internet Virus Antidote

    "Could you be unwittingly spreading a virus of the mind? Passing on lies and misinformation to your friends?

    Could you or someone you know be a victim of an Internet Mind Virus?

    You could. But never fear: the antidote is here. You've seen messages promising money, luck, or sex -- as long as you pass them on. Messages warning you of a dangerous new virus, and begging you to tell your friends, quick! Or perhaps you've seen a topical joke that you wanted to send to all your friends -- send it fast, before they hear it from someone else!

    All of these are viruses. Not computer viruses, but MIND viruses. These messages all have one thing in common: they contain compelling messages, or memes, that grab our attention and persuade us to pass them on. These memes play on our fear of loss, or embarrassment, or appeal to us with promises of sex or money or good luck. Some of messages make us feel good about ourselves because we believe that by passing on a plea for help or signing a petition, we're doing a good deed.

    And sometimes we are. A mind virus or meme is not by itself a bad thing. But would you pass on a mysterious computer virus to a friend? Of course not.

    A powerful Internet Mind Virus compels us to re-send it to others. The message spreads explosively as we and many others help it reproduce. The information in the message -- whether true or false, useful or not -- becomes widespread, infecting many people.

    Most of these viruses of the mind are spread because they are intriguing or frightening or inspiring, and not necessarily because they're true. That's the problem. "


  • Create


    Occasionally, xTools promotes a *comment* to blog status.  *How the hell did that happen? * Oh, well...


    Though James seems to yearn for uncritical unanimity over there, here--anything goes...forever in the tantric throes of critical examination (self- and otherwise).  A-ha!


    *Let's see...should I create a new blog or merely enhance a comment, "blog it up"...hrmmm...??*


    There are some patents given for "enhancements" but most patents are given for "inventions".  In as much as law IS semantics, that's a harsh distinction.  But one that seems to hold up the underbelly of creative efforts.


    *Nothing new under the sun.*  Except that observation was new the first time it was thought/spoken. 


    And the sun? Was it once itself not new?  And the galaxy it spun from was once new too?   The spirit of Gaia dancing in the stars is Goddess Invention herself and not merely a wearer of old hats employed to *dress up* or enhance the universe.


    Of course, energy *is neither created nor destroyed*.  Hence, merely enhanced?  Yes, most systems are entropic--endlessly recombinant of worlds, worlds "revolving like ancient women gathering fuel in vacant lots," but destined, nonetheless, for an effusive doomsday. Yet we find rare systems, like Life, which appear otherwise, to diminish entropy, doing so not merely through permutation and elaboration but apparently through a perforate local infusion of grand creation itself.  Anew.


    A diamond polished is an enhancement on one in the rough.  But when life arose from the inorganic, was that merely an enhancement of *old stuff*?  Some say yes.  Some say no.  But the distinction is more than semantics. It's a fundamental outlook.  It speaks of the Force.  Final answer. he he.


    he he.

Recent Posts

Categories

The End of Days

February 2002
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728